{
 "culture": "en-US",
 "name": "Timber_Lakes_Contours",
 "guid": "85FEEE7B-412F-478C-8643-420B3A73D81F",
 "catalogPath": "",
 "snippet": "Two foot contours created by Aero graphics back in 1997.\n\nDIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY ACCURACY DECLARATION\nDigital map data contained in these files was collected by\nphotogrammetric methods. Reasonable procedures have been adhered\nto with regard to photo scale, equipment, calibration and operator\nexperience to achieve the accuracy required by the scope of work.\nThe accuracy of this data presumes that there is no\ndiscernable error in the ground control survey.\nAero-Graphics cannot be responsible or liable for the further\nmanipulation and plotting of design maps by the user's software.\nThe data collection procedure is designed to meet or exceed\nthe requirements of United States National Map Accuracy Standards.\n1. Horizontal accuracy. For maps on publication scales larger\nthan 1:20,000, not more than 10 percent of the points tested\nshall be in error by more than 1/30 inch, measured on the\npublication scale; for maps on publication scales of 1:20,000\nor smaller, 1/50 inch. These limits of accuracy shall apply\nin all cases to positions of well-defined points only. Welldefined\npoints are those that are easily visible or\nrecoverable on the ground, such as the following: monuments or\nmarkers, such as bench marks, property boundary monuments;\nintersections of roads, railroads, etc.; corners of large\nbuildings or structures (or center points of small buildings);\netc. In general, what is well-defined will also be determined\nby what is plottable on the scale of the map within 1/100\ninch. Thus, while the intersection of two roads or property\nlines meeting at right angles would come within a sensible\ninterpretation, identification of the intersection of such\nlines meeting at an acute angle would obviously not be\npracticable within 1/100 inch. Similarly, features not\nidentifiable upon the ground within close limits are not to be\nconsidered as test points within the limits quoted, even\nthough their positions may be scaled closely upon the map. In\nthis class would come timber lines, soil boundaries, e",
 "description": "A brief narrative summary of the data set.  REQUIRED.",
 "summary": "Two foot contours created by Aero graphics back in 1997.\n\nDIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY ACCURACY DECLARATION\nDigital map data contained in these files was collected by\nphotogrammetric methods. Reasonable procedures have been adhered\nto with regard to photo scale, equipment, calibration and operator\nexperience to achieve the accuracy required by the scope of work.\nThe accuracy of this data presumes that there is no\ndiscernable error in the ground control survey.\nAero-Graphics cannot be responsible or liable for the further\nmanipulation and plotting of design maps by the user's software.\nThe data collection procedure is designed to meet or exceed\nthe requirements of United States National Map Accuracy Standards.\n1. Horizontal accuracy. For maps on publication scales larger\nthan 1:20,000, not more than 10 percent of the points tested\nshall be in error by more than 1/30 inch, measured on the\npublication scale; for maps on publication scales of 1:20,000\nor smaller, 1/50 inch. These limits of accuracy shall apply\nin all cases to positions of well-defined points only. Welldefined\npoints are those that are easily visible or\nrecoverable on the ground, such as the following: monuments or\nmarkers, such as bench marks, property boundary monuments;\nintersections of roads, railroads, etc.; corners of large\nbuildings or structures (or center points of small buildings);\netc. In general, what is well-defined will also be determined\nby what is plottable on the scale of the map within 1/100\ninch. Thus, while the intersection of two roads or property\nlines meeting at right angles would come within a sensible\ninterpretation, identification of the intersection of such\nlines meeting at an acute angle would obviously not be\npracticable within 1/100 inch. Similarly, features not\nidentifiable upon the ground within close limits are not to be\nconsidered as test points within the limits quoted, even\nthough their positions may be scaled closely upon the map. In\nthis class would come timber lines, soil boundaries, e",
 "title": "Timber Lakes Contours",
 "tags": [
  "Elevation",
  "Contour",
  "Topology"
 ],
 "type": "Map Service",
 "typeKeywords": [
  "Data",
  "Service",
  "Map Service",
  "ArcGIS Server"
 ],
 "thumbnail": "thumbnail/thumbnail.png",
 "url": "",
 "extent": [
  [
   -111.303467722189,
   40.4483246732793
  ],
  [
   -111.218878880509,
   40.4971415326965
  ]
 ],
 "minScale": 0,
 "maxScale": 1.7976931348623157E308,
 "spatialReference": "NAD_1983_StatePlane_Utah_Central_FIPS_4302_Feet",
 "accessInformation": "",
 "licenseInfo": ""
}